[Check_mk (english)] match on service status
Arjen Van Drie
arjen-monitor at gugu.be
Thu Jan 14 11:30:30 CET 2016
sorry for not replying sooner.
This looks like a solution!
On 2016-01-11 15:16, Marcel Schulte wrote:
> Hi Arjen,
> no, you cannot ignore services because of their status details.
> But you can set "Use description as service name for network interface
> checks" and "Use alias as service name for network interface checks"
> in "WATO -> Host & service parameters -> Parameters for discovered
> services -> (section '￼Inventory - automatic service detection') ->
> Network Interface and Switch Port Discovery" rules. This way you get
> the portname in service description and can ignore other services as
> Don't forget to rediscover affected hosts!
> Arjen Van Drie <arjen-monitor at gugu.be <mailto:arjen-monitor at gugu.be>>
> schrieb am Mo., 11. Jan. 2016 um 13:12 Uhr:
> Hi List,
> check_mk 1.2.6_12, we are trying to use WATO as much as possible.
> We have a number of cisco switches of which we want to monitor
> only ports that have their portname set. The portname is displayed
> in the service status field.
> If NOT SET, we have
> if SET, we have the hostname of the connected device which, of
> course, typically does not contain the string gigabitethernet.
> Now, the question:
> can we ignore services by "service status" in a rule, preferably
> through wato?
> Thank you in advance,
> checkmk-en mailing list
> checkmk-en at lists.mathias-kettner.de
> <mailto:checkmk-en at lists.mathias-kettner.de>
> sent from my mobile, sorry for typos ;)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the checkmk-en