[Check_mk (english)] high cpu not notified

Philippe Duthoit pdt at 3e.eu
Wed Sep 20 15:05:01 CEST 2017


Sorry if I was unclear

the service doesn't go critical, somehow/somewhere the treshold has been 
adapted, but I don't know where

the logs proof this : CPU is 99.5% but state is kept to OK

nagios.log:[1505907470] INITIAL SERVICE STATE: ip-rancher-host04;CPU 
load;OK;HARD;1;OK - 15 min load 10.87 at 8 Cores (1.36 per Core)

nagios.log:[1505907470] INITIAL SERVICE STATE: ip-rancher-host04;CPU 
utilization;OK;HARD;1;OK - user: 99.5%, system: 0.4%, wait: 0.0%, steal: 
0.0%, guest: 0.0%, total: 99.9%

On 09/20/2017 02:39 PM, Zawada Łukasz wrote:
> I understant that service go critical but no notification like email come.
> 
> Check /var/log/maillog
> /omd/sites/nagios/var/log/notify.log
> /omd/sites/nagios/var/log/nagios.log
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: checkmk-en [mailto:checkmk-en-bounces at lists.mathias-kettner.de] On Behalf Of Philippe Duthoit
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 12:32 PM
> To: checkmk-en at lists.mathias-kettner.de
> Subject: Re: [Check_mk (english)] high cpu not notified
> 
> Lukasz,
> 
> Both load and utilisation go rooftop
> 
> Some rule must be preventing the notifications, any place where I can search ?
> 
> On 09/20/2017 12:09 PM, Zawada Łukasz wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Cpu load it's per core, if you have multiple cores that maybe does not
>> exceed the threshold (default it's 5 / 10 per core for 15 minutes) Maybe use cpu utlization.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: checkmk-en [mailto:checkmk-en-bounces at lists.mathias-kettner.de]
>> On Behalf Of Philippe Duthoit
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 11:53 AM
>> To: checkmk-en at lists.mathias-kettner.de
>> Subject: [Check_mk (english)] high cpu not notified
>>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I have a host configured in check_mk that goes rooftop in CPU load, but I don't receive any notification for it. All other notifications work normal.
>>
>> The host is located in a group, we have 60 disabled services (only 1
>> is cpu related but explicitly bound to 1 specific host)
>>
>> Anybody any tip where I should check ?
>>
>> Tnx
>> _______________________________________________
>> checkmk-en mailing list
>> checkmk-en at lists.mathias-kettner.de
>> http://lists.mathias-kettner.de/mailman/listinfo/checkmk-en
>> _______________________________________________
>> checkmk-en mailing list
>> checkmk-en at lists.mathias-kettner.de
>> http://lists.mathias-kettner.de/mailman/listinfo/checkmk-en
>>
> _______________________________________________
> checkmk-en mailing list
> checkmk-en at lists.mathias-kettner.de
> http://lists.mathias-kettner.de/mailman/listinfo/checkmk-en
> _______________________________________________
> checkmk-en mailing list
> checkmk-en at lists.mathias-kettner.de
> http://lists.mathias-kettner.de/mailman/listinfo/checkmk-en
> 


More information about the checkmk-en mailing list